Benedict Cumberbatch looks like a cross between an otter and a halibut. If you saw him walking down the street (and you didn’t know he was Benedict Cumberbatch) you probably wouldn’t look twice. And yet — and yet — he’s frequently included in lists of the “sexiest men alive.” His sex appeal has spawned a group of super-fangirls who call themselves the Cumberb*tches. I must confess that even I — who just called the man a cross between a small aquatic mammal and a sea creature — understand his appeal. So how is this possible? How can a man who looks like Benedict Cumberbatch wield the kind of sex appeal he does? The answer is something I like to call “The Sherlock Effect.”
Though the role of ‘Sherlock’ was by no means Benedict Cumberbatch’s first, it was certainly the role that made him a household name. And it was also the role that made him a sex symbol. Why? Because even though Benedict Cumberbatch looks like . . . well, Benedict Cumberbatch, Sherlock (as played by Benedict Cumberbatch) is all kinds of attractive. Wildly intelligent, unexpectedly vulnerable, maddeningly aloof, and adorably inept in the realm of the everyday, Cumberbatch’s Sherlock is unquestionably swoon-worthy. And as we fell for who Sherlock was on the inside, we became attracted to the way he looked on the outside.
Cumberbatch himself was shocked by fans’ insistence that he had sex appeal. He called his newfound “sexy” status “preposterous,” and said, of the paparazzi, “How many times can you take a photo of a not particularly attractive profile?”
The profile might not be inherently attractive, but — for fans who fell in love with Sherlock — it’s the profile of the man they love. And so, it’s the most attractive profile of them all.
‘Sherlock’ creators clearly understood what had happened to their leading man in the eyes of women everywhere. By season 3 — which aired in 2014 — Cumberbatch’s Sherlock was swinging through windows, nonchalantly kissing swooning girls, and riding motorcycles down staircases. It was 007 meets Sherlock Holmes, and it was glorious. But it would have been totally laughable if not for the Sherlock Effect.
The Sherlock Effect happens in real life too. You might meet a guy who doesn’t seem particularly attractive. But, as you get to know him, and you come to find his inner attributes attractive, he starts to look attractive too. And even though you may remember that when you initially met him you didn’t think he was all that good-looking, when you look at him now all you see is the handsome face of the man you love. (This goes for girls too, obviously.)
Feminists like to complain about physical beauty. Just think about their insistence that fairy tale princes and princesses shouldn’t have to be attractive. Not all people who are beautiful on the inside are beautiful on the outside too, the critique goes. Shouldn’t all levels of attractiveness be represented in fairy tales, just like they are in real life? Is it so hard to believe that a woman might fall in love with an ugly man (or vice versa)?
It isn’t hard to believe at all! Just ask the cumberb*tches. When women who love Sherlock look at Benedict Cumberbatch they see a handsome prince. They’re not settling for an ugly exterior because he’s got a winning interior. They really see a handsome exterior even though he looks like . . . him. Just like someone who’s married to a fat hairy guy she loves a lot looks at her husband and sees her handsome prince.
Fairy tale princes and princesses are beautiful because their inner goodness makes it such that anyone who loved them would see them as beautiful. Sure, maybe in real life Prince Charming’s got nose hair and a spare tire, but when Cinderella looks at him she sees the man she loves. So we see him that way too. And maybe in real life Aurora’s got cellulite and buck teeth but when Prince Phillip looks at her he sees the woman he loves. So we see her that way too.
If you don’t love Sherlock, then Benedict Cumberbatch probably doesn’t do much for you in the looks department. There’s no accounting for taste. That’s why fairy tale princes or princesses have to be generically attractive. So we can all see them as if we knew their inner cores. Their outer beauty tells us that their inner selves are beautiful. So we see them as beautiful on the outside even if, in real life, they aren’t. That’s the beauty of the Sherlock Effect. It can turn a cross between an otter and a halibut into a handsome prince. If that’s not some fairy tale magic right there, I don’t know what is.
7 thoughts on “The Sherlock Effect, And What It Has To Do With Fairy Tales”
Oh, wow … what an interesting analysis… I believe I agree with it. I’m one of those people that believe you choose to love the person you marry, and that you must continually decide to be attracted to them.
On another note … I never Thought that Benedict Cumberbatch is ugly … but I love Sherlock Holmes. And now I’m wondering if that movie has influenced how I see him? I think it has because I didn’t really like him as Dr Strange … I can’t beleive I was brainwashed 😂😂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha! Not brainwashed exactly . . . just in love. Lol.
This is a super interesting analysis! I also feel this with Rory Williams, from Doctor Who. He’s cute, but kind of ordinary, but his amazing goodness and his love for his wife, Amy Pond, make him beautiful. In fact, I think the writers of the show are totally aware of this, because in one episode, Amy actually says this: “You know when sometimes you meet someone so beautiful – and then you actually talk to them and five minutes later they’re as dull as a brick; but then there’s other people. And you meet them and you think, ‘Not bad, they’re okay,’ and when you get to know them … their face just, sort of, becomes them, like their personality’s written all over it, and they just – they turn into something so beautiful. Rory’s the most beautiful man I’ve ever met.”
I absolutely love that quote, and Rory is my favorite character in the show. I really love Sherlock as well 🙂 Great article! I love when you also connect fairytale/princess things to other modern media!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks! That’s a great quote, and totally speaks to this concept!
Yeah, I totally fell down the Sherlock/Cumberbatch madness. However, by Season 3 plus his popularity plus getting older, I was rather out of that love. The show has gotten absurd, and I haven’t even seen the more recent one.
And I think this is something of the Tom Hiddleston effect, not because he is unattractive, but he’s gotten waaay more attention than his more mild attractiveness would perhaps normally gather because his characters and his (not only his characters) personality and charisma. He is not my traditional “type” but I still find him attractive after all my silly crush died down a bit.
And of course celebrity places a glamor over these types of crushes too.
I think that is the thing, similar you said too, about everybody finding different looks attractive. It’s personality and type and character, etc.
Brilliant. I am a huge Sherlock fan (though not a “Cumberb*tch” haha), so I just loved the way you explained this. IT IS SO TRUE.
LikeLiked by 1 person